The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) issued a press release admitting an “error in judgement” in Class 8th Social Science textbook. It has also put on hold the distribution of its newly released Class 8 Social Science textbook after the Supreme Court of India registered a suo motu case over a “selective reference” to “corruption” in the judiciary.In the press release, NCERT stated that certain “inappropriate textual material” had “inadvertently crept” into Chapter 4 of Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Vol II, titled The Role of Judiciary in our Society. Acting on observations made both by the Court and the Department of School Education & Literacy under the Ministry of Education, the council said distribution of the textbook has been placed on “strict hold until further orders.”The body reiterated that it holds the judiciary in the “highest esteem” and recognises it as the upholder of the Constitution and protector of Fundamental Rights. The inclusion of the disputed material, it asserted, was “purely unintentional.” The chapter will now be rewritten in consultation with appropriate authorities and reissued before the commencement of the 2026–27 academic session.
What triggered the intervention
Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court registered a suo motu case taking note of what it described as a “selective reference” in the Class 8 textbook concerning corruption in the judiciary. While the precise wording of the passage has not been officially reproduced in the public domain, the Court’s objection centred on the manner in which the issue was framed.The term “selective” is critical. It suggests imbalance, an isolated reference lacking contextual explanation about institutional safeguards, corrective mechanisms, or the broader constitutional role of the judiciary. In civics education, context is everything. A half-framed idea can distort more than it informs.
Why this matters: The judiciary in a civics text
The judiciary occupies a unique constitutional position. It is the final interpreter of the Constitution, the guardian of Fundamental Rights, and the arbiter of disputes between citizens and the State. Public trust in the courts is foundational.A textbook chapter explaining the “role of the judiciary” is meant to introduce young students to this constitutional architecture. Any reference to corruption, if inadequately framed, risks overshadowing the structural design with episodic allegation.This does not mean institutions are beyond scrutiny. Democracies function on transparency and accountability. However, pedagogy at the middle-school level demands careful calibration. Critique without context can breed cynicism; silence without nuance can breed naïveté.The controversy, therefore, is not about whether corruption can ever be discussed. It is about how and at what level of depth such discussions should be introduced.
