The dark arts of “Hollywood accounting” make it difficult to determine film budgets with precision. But according to reasonable reckonings, James Cameron may have directed not just one but several of the most expensive movies of all time. The underwater sci-fi spectacle that was The Abyss necessitated one of the biggest production budgets of the eighties, but it looked straight off Poverty Row when compared to Cameron’s next project just two years later. Terminator 2: Judgment Day was the first film to cost more than $100 million; True Lies, his next Arnold Schwarzenegger vehicle, could have cost as much as $120 million. What challenge remained for Cameron at that point? Why, re-creating the most famous shipwreck in history.
Such an improbable-sounding ambition didn’t come out of nowhere. Fascinated with the Titanic since childhood, Cameron eventually found himself able to make multiple expeditions of his own to its final resting place in deep-sea submersibles. He wasn’t just well placed to gather the information necessary to bring it back to life on screen, but also to implement and indeed develop the techniques to film it believably, powerfully, and with a high degree of historical accuracy.
It perhaps does Cameron a disservice to refer to him only as a filmmaker, since throughout his career he’s displayed just as much the mind of an engineer, characterized by the willingness to make his own technological advancements in the service of bringing his vision to the screen. You can get some insight into that mind at work in the Studio Binder video above on how he directed the Titanic’s sinking scene.
Titanic cost $200 million, more than the ship herself. In 1997, that was an eye-watering sum, but given the movie’s eventual take of $2.264 billion, it seems money well spent. A non-trivial amount of those profits came from viewers who bought a ticket — again and again, in some cases — expressly to see their favorite heartthrob. But Cameron must have known full well that most moviegoers turned up to see the ship go down; everything thus rode on that one hour of the film’s 195-minute runtime. Its unprecedentedly complex shoot involved, among other things, hundreds of stunt performers and extras, the latest in CGI tools, and a 775-foot-long replica of the Titanic installed in a custom-built seaside set in Mexico. The scene, as well as the film that contains it, holds up nearly thirty years later in part due to this combination of digital and analog effects, a fusion of almost experimentally cutting-edge digital technology and old-fashioned, thoroughly analog movie magic — something Cameron understands just as well as he does undersea exploration.
Related content:
The Fascinating Engineering of the Titanic: How the Great Ocean Liner Was Built
Watch 80 Minutes of Never-Released Footage Showing the Wreckage of the Titanic (1986)
Titanic Survivor Interviews: What It Was Like to Flee the Sinking Luxury Liner
Watch the Titanic Sink in Real-Time
How the Titanic Sank: James Cameron’s New CGI Animation
Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and culture. He’s the author of the newsletter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Summarizing Korea) and Korean Newtro. Follow him on the social network formerly known as Twitter at @colinmarshall.
